A 21-year-old girl exposed the British system

A 21-year-old girl exposed the British system

Shamima Begum can not return to the United Kingdom, the rules of the Supreme Court

Shamima Begum, who left the United Kingdom for Syria to join the Islamic State group as a teenager, will not be allowed to return and fight his citizenship, the Supreme Court ruled.

The Court stated in a unanimous decision that his rights were not violated when she was denied permission to return.

Ms. Begum, 21, wants to come back to defy the decision of the Secretary of Origin to remove his British nationality.

She is currently in a camp controlled by armed guards in northern Syria.

Ms. Begum was 15 when she and two other Schoolgirls from Eastern London leave the United Kingdom in February 2015 and went to Syria to join the Islamic State group.

In 2019, the Sajid Javid Secretary stripped Ms. Begum of his citizenship on national security grounds.

Last July, the Court of Appeal decided that the only way to follow to enable it to enable it in the United Kingdom, as it could not effectively appeal against the decision of the camp of Northern Syria.

The home office then appealed to the Supreme Court to reconsider the judgment of the Court of Appeal, claiming that it to return to the United Kingdom “would create significant national security risks”.

Friday, Lord Reed, President of the Supreme Court, said the government had the right to prevent Ms. Begum from returning to the United Kingdom.

Who is Shamima Begum and how do you lose your citizenship?
‘I did not want to be, it’s a poster girl
Supreme Court to Dominate on the Fate of Shamima Begum
Shamima Begum Return to the United Kingdom ‘a security risk’
Announcement of the decision, Lord Reed said: “The Supreme Court allows unanimously to all the calls of the Secretary of Origin and refers the cross-appeal of Ms. Begum.”

He stated that the judgment of the Court of Appeal “did not give the appreciation of the secretary of origin the respect he should have received” given “the responsibility to make such evaluations” and “and of the accountability of Parliament.

The Lord Reed added the Court of Appeal, “wrongly believed that, when a person’s right to have a fair hearing … has conflict with the requirements of national security, his right to a fair hearing. must prevail. ”

He stated that the right to a fair hearing did not bring to all other considerations, such as public safety. ”
Shamima Begum says she wants forgiveness – but all she’s achieved after two years of battles over her citizenship is legal limbo.

That’s the the extremely unusual outcome of her epic struggle against the home secretary over whether she can still call herself British.

It is the role of judges and the courts to uphold the rule of law – and protect the universal right that each of us has to make our case fairly in court.

But, when it comes to matters of national security – threats to the nation – judges won’t tell ministers that their assessment is wrong unless they have heard compelling evidence to prove it.

In the Begum case, that means she is at the heart of an imperfect world of her own making.

She is stuck, with no right to return under the law.

But, at the same time, her lawyers maintain she can’t take part in her own case to have her citizenship returned because of the uniquely dangerous situation she is in.

Other people banned from the UK have found a way to take part in appeals from overseas – but the camp she is in won’t even let her lawyers visit.

And so the highest court in the land says her entire case must now be paused until she can find some way of taking part.

And perhaps that will never, ever happen.

2px presentational grey line
Lord Reed said the appropriate answer was not to force the government to bring Ms Begum back to the UK – but to pause her legal fight over citizenship until she is in a safer position to take part in her appeal.

He added: “That is not a perfect solution, as it is not known how long it may be before that is possible. But there is no perfect solution to a dilemma of the present kind.”

The current home secretary, Priti Patel, said the Supreme Court’s judgement had “reaffirmed the home secretary’s authority to make vital national security decisions”.

She added: “The government will always take the strongest possible action to protect our national security and our priority remains maintaining the safety and security of our citizens.”
Who is Shamima Begum?
Ms Begum was born in the UK to parents of Bangladeshi heritage.

When she was 15, she and two other schoolgirls left the UK for Syria to join IS.

Ms Begum travelled via Turkey to IS headquarters in Raqqa, where she married a Dutch recruit.

She lived under IS rule for more than three years, and was found, nine months pregnant, in a Syrian refugee camp in February 2019.

The baby later died of pneumonia and Ms Begum said she had previously lost two other children.

Source

The latest short video / vlog in “Imran Khan” Full HD episode.today’s video clips / vlog topic: “A 21-year-old girl exposed the British system” This is a different issue of yesterday.

ایکیس سالہ لڑکی نے برطانوی نظام کو بے نقاب کر دیا | Imran Khan Anchor

After seeing these short video clips / vlog, share their opinions here about the last fresh observation on YouTube Daily Motion Video.
Please share your comment here about the current episode today.

Add comment